Legal Opinion

Will of Keith v. Proffit

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed October 10, 1933:

Fritz, J.

The instrument offered for probate was in the handwriting of the alleged testator, and his signature thereto was genuine, but it did not have the customary attestation clause. Instead, to the left of the testator’s signature there was merely the word “Witnessed,” and under that there were the genuine signatures of Thos. G. Traeumer, James G. Plarden, and Al. J. Lynch. Objections to the probate of the instrument were filed on the ground that it was not executed in the manner prescribed by law. On the hearing for the probate of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Interior Woodwork Co. v. BuhlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Will of Garrecht v. WillisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Will of Mechler v. LuettgerodtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Estate of FeeleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API