Legal Opinion

Strahota v. Strahota

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

This court has often held that one of the most important rights that a normal adult person has is his power to dispose of his property by will as he chooses. In fact, this right has been referred to by this court as a sacred right. The form of wills and the requirements for legal execution thereof are subject to legislative control. It is the policy of courts to sustain a will as legally executed if it is possible to do so consistently with the requirements of the statute. This court has no power to substitute its judgment for that of the legislature as to the essentials of a will and it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allen v. GriffinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Skinner v. American Bible SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Will of Griffith v. GriffithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Fairweather v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Estate of Lagershausen v. KustaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of DejmalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Graffin v. HulettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Spenner v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In re Estate of Warunek v. StalaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API