George Gambill v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Senior Judge.
Appellant was convicted and sentenced, after trial to a jury, for unlawfully purchasing cocaine, morphine, phensal and digalen tablets, allegedly derivatives of opium and cocoa leaves. It was discovered that phensal and digalen are not narcotics and the Government so concedes. When the chemist, who had analyzed the tablets, was called to testify, defendant’s counsel stipulated that all the tablets were narcotic drugs and opium derivatives.
By reason of the fact that the indictment charged more than the Government was prepared to prove, and the stipulation covered some…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. BehrmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Roberts v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- United States v. Edwin Affron KartmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Glenn Dale Castle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Harold DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Robert Lee Gawne v. United States of America, William Thomas Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.