Legal Opinion
FPCI Re-Hab 01 v. E & G INVESTMENTS, LTD.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1989No. B032657PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (S. J.), P. J.
FPCI RE-HAB 01, a California limited partnership (hereinafter RE-HAB), appeals from a judgment following the trial court’s grant of summary judgment favoring respondents, E & G Investments, Ltd., a California limited partnership; Stonebridge Management Corpora tion, a corporation; Dennis Emory, an individual; John Gough, an individual; and Dennis Waldman, an individual (hereinafter referred to collectively as E & G). RE-HAB filed a first amended complaint for money damages against E & G based upon breach of agency by trustee, self-dealing, conspiracy, fraud, unjust…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Karlsen v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Arnolds Management Corp. v. EischenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Bank of Hemet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Armsey v. Channel Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lona v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Abdallah v. United Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Pantoja v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Intengan v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Grant v. Aurora Loan Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.