Legal Opinion
Nadaf-Rahrov v. the Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 10, 2008No. A114016PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J. *
Plaintiff, Forough Nadaf-Rahrov, appeals from the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendants on her various claims of employment discrimination. We reverse in part.
FACTUAL HISTORY
Forough Nadaf-Rahrov began working as a clothes fitter for The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (Neiman Marcus), in Dallas, Texas, in April 1985. In the mid-1990’s, she transferred to a fitter position in the San Francisco store. Between 1997 and 2003, Nadaf-Rahrov had recurrent problems with back and joint pain. Dr. Joel M. Klompus, her treating physician, informed Neiman Marcus that…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Scotch v. Art Institute of California-Orange County, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Nealy v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Children's Hospital Central California v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.