Adams v. John & Helen Murphey Foundation
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACAGNINA, Presiding Judge.
In this appeal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court granting partial summary judgment in favor of the trustees and the John and Helen Murphey Foundation based upon its finding, as a matter of law, that the trust indenture dated January 12,1959, as amended on July 6, 1973, did not permit Helen Murphey to delegate her personal power to amend or revoke the trust. Sum*444mary judgment was proper because the trial court’s finding is supported by the uncontradicted express language of article one, part D, of the amended trust indenture, which states that “[t]he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Webb v. St. Louis County National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Weatherly v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Whitmore v. FabiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. Superior Court, in and for Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barlage v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Smith v. State Dept. of Health & HospitalsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- In Re Guardianship of LeeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Southeast Arizona Medical Center v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Martinets v. PintoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.