Legal Opinion

Martinets v. Pinto

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 25, 2003No. 1 CA-CV 02-0557PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge.

¶ 1 Mark Martinets (“Mark”) appeals from a judgment that his mother, Katherine Martinets (“Katherine”), and his uncle, Paul Herbst (“Paul”), remained beneficiaries of a trust established by their father, Walter P. Herbst (“Walter”), and stepmother, Shirley A. Herbst (“Shirley”). The trial court found that, despite Walter’s intention to disinherit his children, his will, although demonstrating that intention, did not effectively amend the trust because Shirley had not signed it as required by the terms of the trust. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doss v. KalasArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wetherill v. BashamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. In Re Estate of KovalyshynNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Adams v. John & Helen Murphey FoundationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Shaheen TrustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. KAZ Construction, Inc. v. Newport Equity PartnersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Kaz Construction, Inc v. Sierra Cobre Estates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API