Watts v. Espy
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The trial was had on a count for simple negligence and defendant’s pleas in short by consent with leave to give in evidence any special defense that might be properly pleaded. The amendment striking the wanton count and for pleading in short was effected by the pleading and agreement in writing on file of date February 14, 1923.
There was a diagram of the street crossing where the accident occurred that the witness McTyeire for plaintiff had referred to and indicated where the injury occurred, stating that it was where the sidewalk would have extended had the streets not intersected. Though…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Wolffe v. MinnisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Davis v. QuattlebaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Adler v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- J. H. Burton Sons Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Feore v. TrammelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.