Legal Opinion

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Cleveland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 5, 1927No. 6 Div. 686PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] To state the case very briefly, plaintiff's (appellee's) version is that defendant's electric street car stopped at a customary place of stopping where he awaited it to take passage, that he waited until a number of passengers alighted, after which, with reasonable expedition, attempting to get aboard, he reached up and caught some part of the door of the car, whereupon the door was closed, catching his hand, and the car moved ahead, dragging him along until he…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. South & North Ala. Railroad v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Kilcrease v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Garrett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Bachelor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. MacKintosh Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API