Adams v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom Shelby Circuit Court; Douglas Morris, Judge. Action by Aurilla V. P. Adams against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company and others. Erom a judgment for plaintiff for less than her claim, she appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.
Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, for the alleged reasons that appellant has failed to comply with certain rules of this court and with other requirements of appellate procedure. We have concluded, however, to overrule the motion to dismiss, and consider the appeal on its merits.
This action was commenced by appellant against appellees by a complaint of three paragraphs. By the first she sought to secure the abatement of an alleged nuisance, and a recovery of incidental damages. The nuisance in question consisted of an excavation made by appellees in a public highway, known…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Dodge v. PopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Jeffersonville Water Supply Co. v. RiterIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Childers v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Colt v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Rector v. DruleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Brown v. GuthrieIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Hamrick v. HooverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.