Legal Opinion

Ragsdale v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1995No. OTC 3535; SC S41581PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*218VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

In this direct appeal from the Oregon Tax Court, ORS 305.445, taxpayer challenges ajudgment that denied her claim for a refund of state income taxes paid on her federal retirement benefits for the tax year 1991. Ragsdale v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 143 (1994). She claims that Oregon discriminates in taxation between state and federal retirees in violation of the federal constitutional and statutory doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity.1 This court reviews de novo. ORS 305.445; 19.125(3). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the Tax Court.

At all times…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Barker v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Sheehy v. Public Employees Retirement DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Moro v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Sundermier v. State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Stovall v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Vogl v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API