Legal Opinion
Stovall v. State of Oregon
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1996No. CC 93C11180 CC 94C10334 SC S43012PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
In Hughes v. State of Oregon, 314 Or 1, 36, 838 P2d 1018 (1992), this court held, in part, that it was a breach of contract for the State of Oregon to subject to state income taxes employee pension benefits paid under the Public Employes’ Retirement System (PERS), ORS 237.001 to 237.315 (1993), accrued or accruing for work performed before September 29, 1991. Plaintiffs in these two consolidated cases seek damages for that breach. The trial court ruled that the state was liable for those damages and that the damages should be paid out of the state’s General Fund. The trial court enjoined the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moro v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Arken v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. v. Radiator Specialty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- At & T CORP. v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1999
- County of Linn v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.