Barker v. Kansas
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The State of Kansas taxes the benefits received from the United States by military retirees but does not tax the benefits received by retired state and local government employees. Kan. Stat. Ann. §79-3201 et seq. (1989).1 The issue before us is whether the tax imposed on the military retirees is inconsistent with 4 U. S. C. § 111, which provides:
“The United States consents to the taxation of pay or compensation for personal service as an officer or employee of the United States, a territory or possession or political subdivision thereof, the government of the District of Columbia, or an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Pledger v. BosnickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Adkins v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Marx v. BroomMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.