Legal Opinion

State v. Timson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1974No. 73-733PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoRRiGAN, J.

Defendant, John W. Timson, by motion to suppress before his trial, challenged the constitutionality of the use of evidence seized during a search of his person incident to an arrest which he claims was illegal. The issue of the constitutionality of the arrest and the ensuing search and seizure was decided in defendant’s favor by the Court of Appeals, and we affirm that judgment for the reasons stated herein.

I

The testimony reflected by the record apposite to the issue of the legality of the arrest on December 28, 1971, comes from a witness for the state, Captain Carl Rose.

Upon direct…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. State v. MedcalfOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. WadeOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. OtteOhio Supreme Court · 1996

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API