Legal Opinion

National Bank of Tacoma v. Globe Indem. Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1931No. 22917. En BancPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

In the complaint in this case, there are two causes of action, separately stated, each upon a real estate broker’s bond. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that no recovery could be had. Judgment dismissing the action was entered, from which the plaintiff appeals.

There is no substantial dispute as to the controlling-facts, and they may be summarized as follows: The National Bank of Tacoma owns two lots in that city, which are improved and devoted to business purposes, the legal title to which was in the name of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schomig v. KeiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Mapes v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Salisbury v. AlskogWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Texas Co. v. MattisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Brodtmann v. CooperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RutherfordWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sakris v. Eagle Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API