Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Rutherford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1948No. 30733PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

The plaintiff in this action, H. W. Johnson, in his complaint, alleged that, November 25, 1946, the defen dants, James H. Rutherford and Jane Doe Rutherford, husband and wife, retained his services as agent to sell a tavern, described as “Rosemere Tavern,” located at 3215 Z street, Vancouver, Washington, agreeing to pay plaintiff one thousand dollars as commission, if plaintiff negotiated a sale of the tavern at the price fixed by defendants; that the plaintiff found a purchaser, who bought the tavern at defendants’ price; that plaintiff had received one hundred dollars on account of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weingast v. Rialto Pastry Shop, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Irons Investment Co. v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Myers v. ArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Salisbury v. AlskogWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. In Re Barclay's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marble v. CleinWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Demetre v. SavasOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. In Re Stoddard's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Main v. TaggaresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Arellano v. Primerica Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API