Legal Opinion

Schomig v. Keiser

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1922No. S. F. No. 10229PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.

The plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of certiorari directed to the real estate commissioner, and to the judge of the superior court of Alameda County, in the district court of appeal of the first district, second division. The court, without filing any opinion, denied the writ. On petition for rehearing this court granted a rehearing and the writ was issued accordingly.

The petition shows that Edward Rautenberg filed a verified complaint with the real estate commissioner against A. Schomig, showing that he was Rautenberg’s agent in the collection of payments on a contract for the sale of…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Buckley v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Abrams v. DaughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API