Legal Opinion
Texas Co. v. Mattison
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 1929No. 11,544PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.
The Texas Company sues for the return of $1,250 claimed to have been deposited with Mattison, a real estate agent, one of the defendants, as 10 per cent of the purchase price of certain property which the Texas Company desired to purchase for the erection of an automobile filling station.
The other defendants, Cristina and Russell, are sureties in the sum of $5,000 each on the real estate agent’s and broker’s bond of Mattison.
So far as Mattison is concerned, there was no defense worthy of consideration, and he has not appealed from the judgment rendered solidarily against him and his two…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maloney v. AschaffenburgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Nolan v. LabatutSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Lacour v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Harz v. GowlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Stork v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- King v. F. B. Grevemberg & Son, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Schroeder v. MorrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
- Zeller v. ChettaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Boisseau v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Heine v. DicksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.