Legal Opinion
Norman E. Rowell v. BellSouth Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 20, 2005No. 04-10753PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORRESTER, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Norman E. Rowell, filed suit against BellSouth Corporation (“Bell-South”)1 pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., contending that due to his age, BellSouth forced him to retire during a reduction in force. The district court found that Rowell’s claim was merit-less because he could not show that Bell-South constructively discharged him, and therefore Rowell did not suffer an adverse employment action. On appeal, Rowell contends that the district court erred in holding that a reasonable person would not *796have…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Loretta Wilson v. B/E Aerospace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Joseph MacUba v. Matthew Deboer, Michael Youseff, Charlotte Commissioners, Individually and in Their Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Leanne Renee Kidd v. Mando American CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hernandez v. Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Aliotta v. BairCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.