Johnson v. Lamprecht
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
The sole question is whether the amended plan of recapitalization of The National Refining Company, which was adopted by more than two-thirds of the shareholders, is of such a character that a court of equity should prevent it from being placed in operation at the instance of minority holders of the present preferred stock.
If the plaintiffs, as minority stockholders, make the exchange proposed they will receive one and one-third shares of a six per cent prior preferred stock for their present eight per cent preferred stock. The stipulated'] income yield on the investment will, therefore, be…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- Dodge v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Morris v. American Public Utilities CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Wright v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schuckman v. RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Stepak v. ScheyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Shanik v. White Sewing Machine CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1941
- Kreicker v. Naylor Pipe Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Knight, Exr. v. ShutzOhio Supreme Court · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.