Randall v. Duff
California Supreme Court
Motion to affirm a judgment appealed from the Superior Court of Humboldt County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Motion to affirm the judgment upon the ground that the appeal is without merit and merely for delay.
A motion heretofore made herein to dismiss the appeal was urged upon the same grounds as are now urged in support of the present motion, and was denied. (Randall v. Duff, 104 Cal. 126.) In the opinion then given reference was made to Howell v. Howell, 101 Cal. 115, in which it was said: “When an appeal has been regularly taken from an order of the superior court the lack of a bill of exceptions embodying and authenticating its proceedings is not a ground for dismissing the appeal, but rather…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Randall v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tobias v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Estate of YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Jarman v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Nevills v. ShortridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hyde v. St. ClairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.