Legal Opinion

Winkler v. City of Hastings

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1909No. 15,456PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Adams county: Ed L. Adams, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Several parcels of plaintiff’s agricultural land, each containing more than five acres, were detached from the city of Hastings by decree of the district court, and this is defendant’s appeal therefrom.

In severing the land from the municipality the trial court assumed to exercise a power conferred by section 4 of the Hastings charter. Comp. St. 1901, ch. 13, art. Ill, sec. 4. When the legislature convened in 1903 that .section was in this form: “The corporate limits of such city shall remain as heretofore, and the mayor and council may by ordinance include therein all the territory contiguous…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Wahoo v. DickinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. State ex rel. Hammond v. DimondNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bisenius v. City of RandolphNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. City of Hastings v. HansenNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Searle v. YensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Nickel v. School Board of AxtellNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wagner v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Williams v. County of BuffaloNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Lyon v. City of PayetteIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API