Legal Opinion
System Fuels, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 11, 2010No. 03-2624CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON RECONSIDERATION AND FINAL ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
On August 7, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued three decisions to correct the causation analysis employed by the United States Court of Federal Claims in: Yankee Atomic Elec. Co. v. United States, 536 F.3d 1268 (Fed.Cir.2008) (“Yankee Atomic II”); Pacific Gas and Elec. Co. v. United States, 536 F.3d 1282 (Fed.Cir.2008) (“Pac. Gas & Elec.”); and Sacramento Mun. Util. Dist. v. United States, 293 Fed.Appx. 766 (Fed.Cir.2008) (“SMUD IV”).
In light of these decisions, reconsideration of System…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Centex Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Boston Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Southern California Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.