Legal Opinion
System Fuels, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 19, 2012No. 2010-5116, 2010-5117PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge RADER. Opinion coneurring-inpart, dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
RADER, Chief Judge.
On summary judgment, the United States Court of Federal Claims determined that the United States breached its contract with Plaintiffs-Appellants System Fuels, Inc., System Energy Resources, and South Mississippi Electric Power Association (collectively “Plaintiffs”) for the removal of spent nuclear fuel. Sys. Fuels, Inc. v. United States, 66 Fed.Cl. 722, 732-33 (2005) (“SFI /”). The trial court also granted summary judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Home Savings of America, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Kansas Gas and Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Shell Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.