Legal Opinion

J. D. Richardson Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 21, 1947No. C. D. 1053PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

This case involves the amount of duty properly assessable upon 16 importations totaling 16,971 tank idler wheel rims returned to the United States after having been shipped by the Kelsey-Hayes Wheel Co. of Detroit, Mich., to its Canadian plant in order that they might have a flange turned thereon. There is no dispute as to the appropriate rate of duty tp be applied to these articles, viz, 27K per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 372, Tariff Act of 1930, which is the rate assessable on parts of machines. The question for determination is whether this rate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Hillhouse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  3. Protest 71634-K of GreeneUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  4. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Midland Linseed Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seideman Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API