Veco Alaska, Inc. v. State, Department of Labor, Division of Workers' Compensation, Second Injury Fund
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Cornelius "Buck" Huizenga worked at VECO for approximately eleven years in a number of positions. Before beginning his VECO employment, he sustained a back injury while working for another employer. He reinjured his back at his VECO job while moving some timbers. He then had three surgeries and ultimately was confined to a wheelchair. VECO paid his workers' compensation benefits and petitioned the Second Injury Fund for partial reimbursement. The Fund denied both that Huizenga had a qualifying preexisting condition and that VECO had established by a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Denton v. Sunflower Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
- Employers Commercial Union Insurance Group v. ChristAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hutton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- State, Department of Labor & Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Second Injury Fund v. Tongass Business CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- N. LAKE TAHOE PROTECTION DIST. VS. BD. OF ADMIN.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
- N. LAKE TAHOE PROTECTION DIST. VS. BD. OF ADMIN.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
- N. Lake Tahoe Fire Prot. Dist. v. Bd. of Admin. of the Subsequent Injury Account for the Associations of Self-Insured Pub. Or Private Emp'rsNevada Supreme Court · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.