Legal Opinion

Veco Alaska, Inc. v. State, Department of Labor, Division of Workers' Compensation, Second Injury Fund

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2008No. SS-12163PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Cornelius "Buck" Huizenga worked at VECO for approximately eleven years in a number of positions. Before beginning his VECO employment, he sustained a back injury while working for another employer. He reinjured his back at his VECO job while moving some timbers. He then had three surgeries and ultimately was confined to a wheelchair. VECO paid his workers' compensation benefits and petitioned the Second Injury Fund for partial reimbursement. The Fund denied both that Huizenga had a qualifying preexisting condition and that VECO had established by a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Denton v. Sunflower Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
  5. Employers Commercial Union Insurance Group v. ChristAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hutton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State, Department of Labor & Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Second Injury Fund v. Tongass Business CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. N. LAKE TAHOE PROTECTION DIST. VS. BD. OF ADMIN.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. N. LAKE TAHOE PROTECTION DIST. VS. BD. OF ADMIN.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. N. Lake Tahoe Fire Prot. Dist. v. Bd. of Admin. of the Subsequent Injury Account for the Associations of Self-Insured Pub. Or Private Emp'rsNevada Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API