Bockness v. Brown Jug, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Ray Bockness appeals the partial denial of workers’ compensation benefits for a work-related back injury.. The Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board found that Bockness’s employer, Brown Jug, Inc., did not need to pay for chiropractic treatments beyond those authorized by 5 AAC 45.082 or for more than six weeks of injection therapy. The superior court affirmed. Because the Board correctly applied the law to Bockness’s claim and because substantial evidence exists to support the Board’s decision, we affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Ray Boekness, an employee of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Chiropractors for Justice v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Temple v. Denali Princess LodgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- PHILLIP WEIDNER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. HibdonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Bloom v. Tekton, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.