Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Diangelus
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 27, 2006No. 1020 DD3PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*3 OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
Respondent Lawrence J. DAngelus (DiAngelus) has filed exceptions to the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board (Board) that he should be disbarred. For the reasons that follow, we find that DiAngelus engaged in misconduct and as a result we impose a sanction of a five-year suspension.
Background
DiAngelus was admitted to the Pennsylvania bar in 1972. In 1984, this Court issued an Order of disbarment on consent based upon DiAngelus’ misuse and misappropriation of client funds obtained by securing unauthorized client loans, commingling and converting client funds and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney ASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re: Vencil, N. Appeal of: PA State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CappuccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- ODC v. Jonathan F. AltmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DiangelusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006