Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Diangelus

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 2006No. 1020 DD3Published

1Opinion of the Court

907 A.2d 452 (2006)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

v.

Lawrence J. DIANGELUS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 19, 2005.

Decided September 27, 2006.

Alan J. Davis, Esq., Philadelphia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Samuel C. Stretton, Esq., West Chester, William Costopoulos, Lemoyne, for Lawrence J. DiAngelus.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.

OPINION

Justice NEWMAN.

Respondent Lawrence J. DiAngelus (DiAngelus) has filed exceptions to the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board (Board) that he should be disbarred. For…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KiesewetterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. West Chester Area School District v. Collegium Charter SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API