Legal Opinion
The Dow Chemical Company v. Metlon Corporation, and Hayden C. Cobb, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1960No. 8067_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOREMAN, Circuit Judge.
This action was instituted in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, by The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware corporation with principal offices in Michigan and a division office in Charlotte, North Carolina, seeking in- junctive relief and damages for infringement of two patents owned by it, namely, No. 2,714,569 [issued to Karl E. Prindle and George H. Lacy — hereinafter referred to as the “Prindle” patent], and No. 2,772,994 [issued to George H. Lacy, hereinafter called the “Lacy” patent].
The plaintiff alleges…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- American Cyanamid Company v. Nopco Chemical Company and Quality Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Watsco, Inc. v. Henry Valve CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Howard G. Dindo v. Harold O. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.