Legal Opinion

Advanced Spine Centers, Inc. v. Amica Mutual Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 22, 2008Published

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, P.J.

As the Supreme Judicial Court recently reiterated, the Massachusetts no-fault insurance system “was intended to control the costs of compulsory automobile insurance.” Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mass., Inc., 451 Mass. 389, 394 (2008). To help effectuate that goal, the Legislature in G.L.c. 90, §34A set out a ‘“coordination of benefits’ scheme providing for the sharing of costs between automobile and health insurers.” Id. at 391. On this appeal, we are called upon to determine the scope of that coordination.

There has never been a dispute about the facts in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Creswell v. Medical West Community Health Plan, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Dominguez v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Tucci v. DiGregorioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. 402 Rindge Corp. v. Ming TsaoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API