Legal Opinion

Long v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 29, 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying post-conviction relief. The petitioner (whom the file indicates is now on parole) was a co-defendant with the defendant in State v. Romero, 1 Or App 217, 461 P2d 70 (1969). We there held, in a direct appeal, that the enhanced penalty was invalid because the prosecutor did not proceed in a reasonably prompt time in compliance with ORS 168.055. The facts concerning the length of sentence and the imposition of the enhanced *291penalty based on tbe conviction of previous felonies are tbe same in both cases, except that Long did not appeal as did Romero. Based…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Blain v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API