Long v. Cupp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying post-conviction relief. The petitioner (whom the file indicates is now on parole) was a co-defendant with the defendant in State v. Romero, 1 Or App 217, 461 P2d 70 (1969). We there held, in a direct appeal, that the enhanced penalty was invalid because the prosecutor did not proceed in a reasonably prompt time in compliance with ORS 168.055. The facts concerning the length of sentence and the imposition of the enhanced *291penalty based on tbe conviction of previous felonies are tbe same in both cases, except that Long did not appeal as did Romero. Based…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Blain v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002