Legal Opinion

Paschal v. Hobby

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1927No. 1396. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGHTOWER, O. J.

This suit was filed in the district court of Jefferson county (Sixtieth judicial district) by W. P. Hobby, then Governor of Texas, for the use and benefit of Carrie Conn and others, alleged to be the lawful heirs of T. S. Spicer, deceased, who died in Jefferson county, Tex., prior to January 5, 1917, and on that date J. A. Paschal, appellant here, was duly appointed administrator of the estate of T. S. Spicer by the probate court of Jefferson county, and he, in due time, qualified as such administrator and filed his bond, upon which the United States Fidelity & Guaranty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cameron v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sabrinos v. ChamberlainTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. PaschalTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Tannery v. PirtleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Smith v. PaschalTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Murray v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API