Legal Opinion
Dante v. Miniggio
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 5, 1924No. 3956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
On October 12, 1909, there was due plaintiff, Miniggio, appellee here", 7,815.56 francs, for merchandise purchased from him in Paris, France, by Mrs. Hutchins, wife of Stil,son Hutchins, since deceased, whose estate now is represented by the defendant, Dante, appellant here. This action in assumpsit was instituted in September of 1921, and issue was joined therein in the following October.
At the trial defendant tendered the number of francs due in 1909, with interest in francs, “and costs of suit to date.” Whether these costs were tendered in francs or dollars does not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Birge-Forbes Co. v. HeyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Colby v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Guinness v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- Page v. LevensonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brooklyn City R.R. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
- Compania Engraw Commercial E. Industrial S. A. v. Schenley Distillers Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Oregon Short Line R. v. Clark County Highway Dist.District Court, D. Idaho · 1927
- Miller v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Compania Engraw Commercial E. Industrial S.A. v. Schenley Distillers Corporation. Schenley Distillers Corporation v. Compania Engraw Commercial E. Industrial S.ACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.