Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Sturm

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiff commenced this tort action against the defendant to recover damages for the alienation of her husband’s affections. The defendant is the mother of Vincent Anderson, who was the husband of the plaintiff. Upon the trial of the cause, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to sustain her motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict.

When the sufficiency of the evidence is thus challenged, the evidence offered must be viewed in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, and every reasonable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lemons v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hicklin v. AndersOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hughes v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Noll v. CarlinOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Bradford v. BradfordOregon Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. Aguirre-RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Crewse v. MunroeOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Edgren v. ReissnerOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Miller v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API