Legal Opinion

Crewse v. Munroe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1960PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The plaintiff was a patient of the defendant, a practicing physician, and claims his injuries are due to negligence. The claim of malpractice is based upon the administration by the defendant of an anesthetic. At the close of the plaintiff’s case the defendant moved for an involuntary nonsuit, which was granted, and the plaintiff appeals.

Since the motion for an involuntary nonsuit challenges the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff’s evidence, we must consider his evidence in a light most favorable to him. Phillips v. Colfax Company,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eitel v. Times, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lemons v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Wintersteen v. SemlerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Simpson v. HillmanOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Phillips v. Colfax Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Sáez v. Municipio de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  3. Ramos Orengo v. Gobierno de la Capital de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  4. McWain v. Tucson General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Crawford v. SeufertOregon Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API