Raphael v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
The imported merchandise involved in this appeal consists of certain rugs composed of or containing cotton, jute and artificial silk, cotton being the component material of chief value. Twelve importations are involved, eleven of which were assessed with duty by the collector at 40 per centum ad valorem under the provision of paragraph 1022 of the Tariff Act of 1922 for “all other floor coverings not specially provided for.” The other importation, covered by protest 559841-G, was assessed for duty at the same rate under paragraph 1117 of said act as “Wilton * * * rugs, and * * * rugs * * * of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Seeberger v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Steinhardt & Bro. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- United States v. Linen Thread Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Magone v. LuckemeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014