Legal Opinion

Seeberger v. Farwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 13, 1891No. 1441PublishedCited by 28 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OE ILLINOIS. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatcheord

This is an action at law, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, in August, 1888, by John Y. Farwell and others, copartners as John Y. Farwell & Co., against Anthony F. Seeberger, collector of customs for the port and district of Chicago, to recover an alleged excess of duties, paid under protest, in that month, on a quantity of imported women’s and children’s dress goods, which were dutiable under the provision of Schedule K of section 2502 -of the Devised Statutes, as enacted by section 6 of the act of March 3, 1883, c. 121, which provided…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  4. Heartland By-Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  5. Commonwealth ex. rel. Page Milling Co. v. Shenandoah River Light & Power Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1923

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API