Legal Opinion
In Re Green Grand Jury Proceedings
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 27, 2005No. 0:05-cv-00003Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, Chief Judge.
Three juveniles, C.A.S., A.J., and M.A., received grand jury subpoenas dated April 6, 2005. Two of the juveniles had previously talked with federal agents, but subsequently declined to speak, further with the agents. The subpoenas were served thereafter, directing the juveniles to appear, testify, and produce a complete set of fingerprints, an oral DNA swab, and color photos of each child’s clothed body.
The juveniles move to quash the subpoenas, arguing that a grand jury subpoena is improper when investigating a crime arguably committed by a juvenile, because a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Eric B.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Involving VickersDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- United States v. A.W.J.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986