Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Involving Vickers

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided December 4, 1998No. 1:98-cv-00011PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

McAULIFFE, District Judge.

On October 29, 1998, William Harry Vickers was served with a grand jury subpoena, directing him to provide major case prints (i.e., fingerprints and palm prints), saliva, and hair samples to the federal grand jury investigating recent pipe bombing incidents in Concord, New Hampshire. 1 On November 2, 1998, Joseph Haas, Jr., received a similar subpoena, seeking major case prints, saliva, and hair samples. Neither man provided the grand jury with the requested samples. Consequently, on application of the government, the court ordered them to appear and show cause…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HardawayMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Special ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. People v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. MaxwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. In Re ShabazzDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API