Legal Opinion
Shepherd v. Hood
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 10, 1939No. 29138PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
Ed 1-Iood, while employed by W. E. Shepherd & Son, sustained an injury to both feet, resulting in permanent partial disability. There is no question about the employment or the nature and extent of the injury. The Workmen’s Compensation Law provides that the “average weekly wages” of the injured employee at the time of the injury shall be taken as the basis upon which to compute compensation (see. 13355, O. S. 1931, 85 Okla. St. Ann. § 21), and for injuries of this type claimant is entitled to 66 2/3 per cent, of his “average weekly wage” for a certain number of weeks to be determined…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Skelly Oil Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Chestnut Smith v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Thibeault v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SwitchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Clopton v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Mazzio's Corp. v. DickCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Carrico v. City of MiamiCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990