Legal Opinion

Aguilar v. Drug Enforcement Agency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 2, 2001No. 99-16867; D.C. No. CV-97-00477-RHWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

The United States appeals a district court judgment in favor of Eneida Aguilar, her children, and her parents-in-law, all of whom are the statutory beneficiaries of Eneida’s husband, David Aguilar. The beneficiaries brought suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., after David was shot and killed by James Laverty, a Special Agent of the Drug Enforcement Administration.

An advisory jury found, and the district court agreed, that the government should be hable for David’s death because Laverty was not acting in self-defense when he shot David. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raymond A. Shaw and Karen L. Shaw, Husband and Wife, Individually, and as Guardians Ad Litem of Richard Scott Shaw, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. LueckArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Ramon Garcia Maria Morfin Garcia v. United States of America, U.S. Dept. Of Justice & I & NsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Hansen v. Garcia, Fletcher, Lund and McVeanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API