Legal Opinion

Thornton v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLE

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 1990No. 109 W.D. Miscellaneous Docket 1988PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

This matter presents yet another opportunity for us to address the question of whether court-appointed appellate counsel may be sanctioned pursuant to Rule 2744 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure, Pa.R.A.P. 2744, for the filing of a frivolous appeal. In the instant matter, however, the question arises in a slightly different context, requiring us to consider the propriety of an order of the Commonwealth Court denying court-appointed counsel permission to withdraw from representation of a defendant whose appeal has not yet been adjudged frivolous. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Zerby v. ShanonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Seilhamer v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Robinson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Bowman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API