Thornton v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLE
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
This matter presents yet another opportunity for us to address the question of whether court-appointed appellate counsel may be sanctioned pursuant to Rule 2744 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure, Pa.R.A.P. 2744, for the filing of a frivolous appeal. In the instant matter, however, the question arises in a slightly different context, requiring us to consider the propriety of an order of the Commonwealth Court denying court-appointed counsel permission to withdraw from representation of a defendant whose appeal has not yet been adjudged frivolous. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Zerby v. ShanonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Seilhamer v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Robinson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Bowman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.