Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1998PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

John Bowman appeals from a decision of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) which denied him administrative relief from the Board’s July 24, 1996 decision recommitting Bowman as both a technical and convicted parole violator and recalculating his maximum term expiration date accordingly.

The facts underlying this appeal are as follows. Although Bowman has a long history of incarceration, the pertinent events began in 1981 when Bowman, who was on parole at the time, received a new conviction. After serving Board-imposed baektime of 12 months, Bowman was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Krantz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. ShoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. LaCourt v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Moss v. SCI - Mahanoy Superintendent Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Forbes v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. White v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Spruill v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Gruff v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API