Legal Opinion

State v. Lord

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2007No. 77472-2PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 The right to a fair trial by an impartial jury is a foundation of our criminal justice system. Today we must decide whether the courtroom presence of lapel buttons, showing a picture of the victim, deprived the defendant of this fundamental right. We conclude, as did the courts below, there was no inherent prejudice and affirm the conviction.

J.M. Johnson, J.

¶2 Our constitution also guarantees that a trial will be public, allowing the attendance of spectators who have an interest in the trial. Courts must presume that the jurors we entrust with determining guilt both understand, and have…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Devall DavidsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API