Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Arcade Inv. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 9, 1946No. Civil Action No. 841PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff commenced action under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 56 Stat. 23 et seq., 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix §§ 901-946, 961-971, 925, hereinafter referred to as the Act, for statutory penalty and to enjoin sales in excess of maximum price regulations.
A pre-trial conference was had and the facts were stipulated by the parties. The defendant is a private business corporation organized under Minnesota law. Jurisdiction is conceded in all respects.
Defendant owns and operates two separate commercial buildings and the Lowry Garage, all located in the same…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Davies Warehouse Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Helvering v. Rebsamen Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Speten v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Bowles v. AmmonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mercado v. BrannanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Woods v. CorseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948