Rosso v. Hallmark Homes of Minneapolis, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.*
Appellant homeowners experienced moisture problems with their home and sued the builder on various theories. The district court dismissed their action, determining that the ten-year limitation on commencing claims had run. Minn.Stat. § 541.051, subd. 1(a). Because we conclude there can be “substantial completion” of construction before the issuance of a municipal certifícate of occupancy, we affirm the district court. We further conclude equitable tolling is not a basis for reversing the district court’s disposition.
FACTS
The facts bearing on this decision are not in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Damon v. Vista Del Norte Development, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Damon v. Vista del Norte Dev., LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Horning v. Penrose Plumbing & Heating Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Horning v. Penrose Plumbing & Heating Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014