Legal Opinion

Rosso v. Hallmark Homes of Minneapolis, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 10, 2014No. A13-1304PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.*

Appellant homeowners experienced moisture problems with their home and sued the builder on various theories. The district court dismissed their action, determining that the ten-year limitation on commencing claims had run. Minn.Stat. § 541.051, subd. 1(a). Because we conclude there can be “substantial completion” of construction before the issuance of a municipal certifícate of occupancy, we affirm the district court. We further conclude equitable tolling is not a basis for reversing the district court’s disposition.

FACTS

The facts bearing on this decision are not in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Damon v. Vista Del Norte Development, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Damon v. Vista del Norte Dev., LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Horning v. Penrose Plumbing & Heating Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Horning v. Penrose Plumbing & Heating Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API