Legal Opinion · Dissent

Horning v. Penrose Plumbing & Heating Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2014No. S-14-0067Published

1DissentFox, Justice

[¶ 28] I respectfully dissent. As the majority recognizes, the HVAC is an "improvement" to real property under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-8-111 (LexisNexis 2018). I believe a careful reading of the statute and the policy behind it require us to find that the triggering event to begin the period of repose is substantial completion of the HVAC improvement, not the date of substantial completion of a different improvement, the condominium. Further, there seems to be no basis for the conclusion that substantial completion of the condominium did not occur until the city issued a certificate of occupaney,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of VossWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Worden v. Village HomesWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Covington v. W.R. Grace-Conn., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ocean Winds Corp. v. LaneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Rosso v. Hallmark Homes of Minneapolis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API