Legal Opinion

Faraghar v. Industrial Commission of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 23, 1995No. 1 CA-IC 93-0186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

This is a special action review of an Arizona Industrial Commission (“Commission”) Decision Upon Hearing And Finding And Award, and Decision Upon Review modifying the Award. For the following reasons, we affirm.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL HISTORY

Thomas Faraghar (“Faraghar”), petitioner employer, worked as a stockbroker for Chel sea Street Securities, Inc. (“Chelsea”). Kathleen Lord (“claimant”) worked for Faraghar as a “cold-caller,” an individual hired by a broker to make unsolicited calls to find potential customers for that broker. On February 5,1992, claimant slipped and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Home Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Anton v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Mill Street Church of Christ v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vance International v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. Rural Metro Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Labor Force v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Meno's construction/aig v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API