Legal Opinion
In Re Smith
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 31, 1971PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
116 N.J. Super. 133 (1971)
281 A.2d 279
IN THE MATTER OF PETITION OF THOMAS F.X. SMITH, MUNICIPAL CLERK OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY
IN RE: SPECIAL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
FRANCIS X. HAYES, DEFENDANT INTERVENOR-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted August 20, 1971.
Decided August 31, 1971.
Before Judges KILKENNY, HALPERN and LANE.
Mr. James F. Ryan, Corporation Counsel, for respondent (Mr. Louis P. Caroselli, Second Assistant Corporation Counsel, on the brief).
Mr. Francis X. Hayes, pro se.
2Per curiam
Defendant-intervenor is appealing from a…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Robson v. RodriquezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Horwitz v. ReichensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Pritel v. BurrisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Mancuso v. RothenbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971